May a good source be with you.

Has America Always Been Capitalist?

History shows that capitalism isn’t natural or normal, strengthening the belief that we can create something better.

What is normal?

Is it the right for white men to own slaves?

Is it the idea that freedom can be realised through wage labour?

Is it a society in which democracy is viewed as compatible with an economy run by a small number of massive banks and corporations?

None of this is normal. But while slavery is no longer seen as acceptable, capitalism seems ordinary. Just as Europeans colonised most of the world’s peoples and justified this as the ‘natural’ way of things with racist, Eurocentric ideology, so the tendency in American history is to read the past through the lens of the present: to take what appears as normal today and see it as the regular order of things for all times.

But in many respects, capitalism was not always a normal or natural part of American life. This was especially the case in the American north in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. Here, the family farm remained a mainstay of rural life. And in cities, artisanal production organised around masters, journeymen, and apprentices tended to be the norm. Of course, there were capitalist interests involved in the colonial endeavour from the start; it was a private joint stock company — the Massachusetts Bay Company — that aimed to profit by sending settlers across the Atlantic in the 1600s.

But the social relations that formed in the northern colony and pushed expansion to the western frontier were not exactly ‘capitalist’. The typical small farm of the period was organised around a patriarchal, gendered hierarchy in which men tended to push their families to the frontier, leaving little choice but for their wives and children to join them. They were the rulers of the household, hunting and farming while their wives took care of household chores. However, the goal of social life was not profit, and wage labour was seen as a form of social dependence against freedom. In other words, freedom and wage labour were not necessarily viewed as compatible.

Similarly, an artisan controlled his own schedule and tools and owned what he produced. The artisan’s labour was not alienated from him – what he produced was not owned by another – but controlled by him: his patriarchal freedom was defined against being a dispossessed wage labourer.

This is not to be idealistic. The northern social structure was organised around racism, sexism, and patriarchy. There was a mix of capitalist and non-capitalist elements at work, particularly as tensions grew between settlers who saw the frontier as a zone of independence for their farm-based lifestyles and capitalist speculators who viewed the west as a great space for profits. But the point is simply that capitalism itself, and capitalist labour, was not necessarily ‘normal’.

In the south though, capitalist slavery was normal. It was not so for the slaves themselves, of course, who were brought to the south with their entire lives and bodies controlled by white masters, not just their labour time. But it was normal for politicians, slave owners and poor whites who worked as patrollers at night to capture slaves who had escaped. Racial inferiority was seen as the natural way of things; after all, classically-educated slaveowners read that even Aristotle had said that some people are naturally slaves and others naturally masters.

The normality of slavery was extinguished with the Civil War, wherein somewhere between half to three-quarters of a million people were killed. As slaves rushed to northern lines, and northern military leaders gradually realised it was in their interests to free the slaves (at least in the rebelling states) to strengthen their forces and weaken the south, the north, driven by slave resistance, abolished slavery in the Confederacy.

After the war, as the south was reconstructed, the goal of the north was essential to rebuild the south on the basis of capitalist wage labour. Rarely were ex-slaves given ’40 acres and a mule’. Instead, they were hired as wage labourers or became sharecroppers. As freed blacks pushed to become independent farmers and the white elite worked to resubordinate black plantation labour, so a new class balance was reached as the owners of land and tools allowed freed blacks to work on farms, so long as they paid a price to their former masters who could sell their production for profit.

Meanwhile, in the north, capitalism increasingly became naturalised. By the 1880s, western expansion was driven less and less by the family farm and increasingly by the power of capital as apprentices and journeymen became wage labourers, masters became capitalists or workers themselves, and family farms were replaced by agribusiness. The Midwest became the breadbasket of America as the far west, from Montana and Nevada to New Mexico and California, was developed by railroad and mining companies. While some family farms persisted and were granted land by the Homestead Act of 1862, the west, like the rest of a country born through the racial cleansing of native peoples, became a massive zone of resource extraction.

Overall, by the late 1800s capitalism had effectively become the norm. By this time both the Democratic and Republican Party’s ideologies of freedom and democracy meant, essentially, freedom for capital to control the United States.

As recent polls have shown, millennials have become increasingly critical of capitalism and increasingly supportive of socialism. Symbolised by the popularity of politicians including Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Bernie Sanders, and the rise of the Democratic Socialists of America, this younger generation appears to be looking for a different way forward.

This is complicated by the fact that many Americans have little idea what socialism means, though more often than not the term is used to refer to increased corporate taxes and better welfare programs rather than the rearrangement of our social lives away from profit maximisation and wage labour towards cooperation and the collective management of work.

But if anything is clear from this history it is that capitalism isn’t normal, even in the case of America. And if capitalism isn’t normal, we can certainly imagine other ways of organising ‘normal’ social life.

James Parisot received his PhD in sociology from Binghamton University and currently teaches in the Department of Sociology at Drexel University. He is the co-author of the book American Hegemony and the Rise of Emerging  (published by Routledge).

(This article was originally published at Open Democracy and has been republished under Creative Commons licence.)

Support NewsCentral24x7 and help it hold the people in power accountable.
अब आप न्यूज़ सेंट्रल 24x7 को हिंदी में पढ़ सकते हैं।यहाँ क्लिक करें